Current Date/Time: 9/28/2025 3:07:51 PM
Docket Sheet
TR-91-9
Service List Calendar Comments (0) Media Help
Status
Closed (4/26/1991)
Utility Type
Telephone
Type of Case
Rate Case (Large)
Subject Companies
Style of Case
In the Matter of the Community Optional Service Tariffs of Chariton Valley Telephone Corporation, ET. AL., (Seven Other Companies)
Assigned Judge
Assigned Attorney
Related Submission No.
Consolidated To
Consolidated From
Data Request Contact Person
Display Items: -
Filter by Type of Filing:
Show Only:
or Hide:

Returning 62 / 62
Filed on Behalf of Response to Previous Filings
62
8/19/1991
Other Writ of Review Issued by Cole County Circuit Court, Case Number Cv1911018cc
61
8/16/1991
Other Petition for Writ of Review, Declaratory Judgment, and Application for Stay Filed By MoKan Dial Inc. and Choctaw Telephone Company
60
7/3/1991
Order Order Approving Tariffs
59
6/27/1991
Staff Recommendation Staff Recommendation
58
6/5/1991
Tariff Tariffs (9100471/Wheeling, 9100472/Choctaw, 9100473/Chariton Valley, 9100474/Green Hills, 9100475/KLM, 9100476/MoKan Dial & 9100477/Northeast Missouri)
57
5/29/1991
Other Petition for Writ of Review, Declaratory Judgment, and Application for Stay Filed by Mid-Missouri Telephone Company, Chariton Valley Telephone Corp., ET. AL. Case No. Cv191-645cc.
56
5/28/1991
Tariff Tariff (9100459)
55
5/17/1991
Order Order Denying Application for Rehearing and Granting in Part Motion for Clarification
54
5/2/1991
Application Office of the Public Counsel's Reply to Application for Rehearing and Application for Stay/Extension
53
5/1/1991
Motion Staff's Motion for Clarification
52
4/30/1991
Application Application for Stay/Extension Filed on Behalf of Mid-Missouri Telephone Company
51
4/30/1991
Application Application for Rehearing Filed on Behalf of Chariton Valley Telephone Corp., Mid-Missouri Telephone, Choctaw Telephone, Wheeling Telephone, MoKan Dian, Green Hills Telephone and Northeast Missouri Telephone
50
4/26/1991
Order Report and Order
49
3/18/1991
Other Staff's Response to Argument First Raised in Reply Brief
48
3/15/1991
Motion Motion to Permit Response to Chariton Valley Et Al.'s Contention that their Tariffs have been Automatically Approved Pursuant to Section 392.230.5, Rsmo.Supp.1990, Filed on Behalf of: Missouri Telephone, Eastern Missouri Telephone, Fidelity
47
3/11/1991
Brief Reply Brief of the Office of the Public Counsel
46
3/11/1991
Brief Reply Brief of Missouri Telephone Company, Eastern Missouri Telephone Company, Fidelity Telephone Company, Contel of Missouri, Inc., Contel System of Missouri, Inc., The Kansas State Telephone Company D/B/A Contel of Eastern Missouri and GTE
45
3/11/1991
Brief Reply Brief of United Telephone Company of Missouri
44
3/11/1991
Brief Reply Brief of Intervener Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
43
3/11/1991
Brief Reply Brief of Alltel Missouri, Inc., Citizens Telephone Company, New London Telephone Company, Orchard Farm Telephone Company and Stoutland Telephone Company
42
3/8/1991
Brief Reply Brief of Chariton Valley Telephone Corporation, Mid-Missouri Telephone Company, Choctaw Telephone Company, Wheeling Telephone Company, MoKan Dial, Inc., Green Hills Telephone Company, KLM Telephone Company and Northeast Missouri
41
3/1/1991
Brief Initial Brief of Intervener Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
40
3/1/1991
Brief Initial Post-Hearing Brief of Alltel Missouri, Inc., Citizens Telephone Company, New London Telephone Company, Orchard Farm Telephone Company and Stoutland Telephone Company
39
3/1/1991
Brief Initial Brief of Missouri Telephone Company, Eastern Missouri Telephone Company, Fidelity Telephone Company, Contel of Missouri, Inc., Contel System of Missouri, Inc., The Kansas State Telephone Company D/B/A Contel of Eastern Missouri
38
3/1/1991
Brief Initial Post-Hearing Brief of United Telephone Company of Missouri
37
3/1/1991
Brief Initial Brief of the Office of the Public Counsel
36
3/1/1991
Brief Initial Brief of the Staff of the Missouri Public Service Commission
35
2/27/1991
Brief Initial Brief of Chariton Valley Telephone Corporation, Mid-Missouri Telephone Company, Choctaw Telephone Company, Wheeling Telephone Company, MoKan Dial, Inc., Green Hills Telephone Company, KLM Telephone Company and Northeast Missouri
34
2/13/1991
Other Briefing Schedule Established. (Letter)
33
2/8/1991
Transcripts Transcript Filed of Hearing Held February 6, 1991 (Volume 1)
32
2/6/1991
Other Submitted on the Record (Fee-Harrison) Transcript Required
31
2/4/1991
Response Staff's Response to Motion to Strike
30
2/1/1991
Motion Companies' Motion to Strike
29
1/30/1991
Testimony Applicants' Surrebuttal Testimony (Van Ruler)
28
1/23/1991
Testimony Staff's Direct Testimony (Van Eschen)
27
1/23/1991
Testimony Rebuttal Testimony (Taylor) Filed on Behalf of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
26
1/23/1991
Testimony Rebuttal Testimony (Schoonmaker) Filed on Behalf of Alltel Missouri, Inc., Citizens Telephone, Missouri Telephone, Eastern Missouri Telephone, Fidelity Telephone, Bourbeuse Telephone, Stoutland Telephone, Orchard Farm Telephone, and New London Telephone
25
1/23/1991
Testimony Rebuttal Testimony (Prendergast) Filed on Behalf of United Telephone Company of Missouri
24
12/20/1990
Testimony Direct Testimony of (Van Ruler) Filed on Behalf of Chariton Valley, Choctaw, Green Hills, KLM Mid-Missouri, MoKan Dial, Northeast Missouri, and Wheeling Telephone Companies
23
11/30/1990
Notice Notice Issued Modifying Procedural Schedule
22
11/19/1990
Motion Suggestions Re: Motion for New Procedural Schedule Filed on Behalf of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
21
11/8/1990
Motion Motion for New Procedural Schedule Filed on Behalf of Mid-Missouri, Choctaw, Wheeling, MoKan Dial, Greenhills, KLM and Northeast Missouri Rural Telephone Companies
20
11/2/1990
Order Order Granting Applications to Intervene
19
10/23/1990
Application to Intervene Application to Intervene Filed on Behalf of United Telephone Company of Missouri
18
10/17/1990
Application to Intervene Application to Intervene, Filed on Behalf of GTE North
17
10/5/1990
Order Order Denying Approval of Tariffs and Granting Application’s to Intervene
16
9/24/1990
Other Withdrawal of Application to Intervene Filed on Behalf of Kingdom Telephone Company
15
9/24/1990
Other Response to Suggestions in Opposition to Applications to Intervene Filed on Behalf of Alltel Missouri, Inc., Citizens Telephone, New London Telephone, Orchard Farms Telephone, and Stoutland Telephone
14
9/24/1990
Application to Intervene Motion to Intervene and for Rejection of Tariffs Filed on Behalf of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
13
9/21/1990
Application to Intervene Application to Intervene Filed on Behalf of Contel of Missouri, Inc., Contel System of Missouri, Inc., the Kansas State Telephone Company D/B/A Contel of Eastern Missouri, Missouri Telephone Company, Eastern Missouri Telephone Company
12
9/14/1990
Application to Intervene Suggestions in Opposition to the Application of Alltel, Citizens, Kingdom, New London, Orchard, and Stoutland to Intervene
11
9/12/1990
Application to Intervene Alltel Missouri, Inc.'s Application to Intervene
10
9/12/1990
Application to Intervene Citizens Telephone Company's Application to Intervene
9
9/12/1990
Application to Intervene Kingdom Telephone Company's Application to Intervene
8
9/12/1990
Application to Intervene New London Telephone Company's Application to Intervene
7
9/12/1990
Application to Intervene Orchard Farm Telephone Company's Application to Intervene
6
9/12/1990
Application to Intervene Stoutland Telephone Company's Application to Intervene
5
8/24/1990
Order Order and Notice of Hearing
4
8/24/1990
Other Chariton Valley's Suggestions in Opposition to Staff's Recommended Procedural Schedule
3
8/10/1990
Procedure Schedule Staff's Recommended Procedural Schedule
2
7/10/1990
Tariff Chariton Valley Telephone for Approval of Community Optional Service Tariffs
1
7/10/1990
Order Suspension Order